Supports that help me to live well in the community: experiences of people living with schizophrenia.

INTRODUCTION: People with schizophrenia are more likely to be hospitalised than any other psychiatric diagnosis. Occupational therapists working in mental health are often required to assess and recommend supports that will assist people with schizophrenia to live successfully in the community. There is little research exploring consumer perspectives regarding the support they find useful to stay out of the hospital. The aim of this study was to explore what supports people living with schizophrenia identify as helping them to live in the community and stay out of the hospital. METHOD: Qualitative data were collected via semi-structured interviews with adult consumers (N = 18) diagnosed with schizophrenia. Data were thematically analysed using constant comparative analysis methods. Inductive analysis was followed by a deductive phase of analysis. FINDINGS: Participants highlighted personal-, occupational- and environmental-focused supports. Person-focused supports addressed cognitive and psychological needs. Occupation-focused supports included assisting people to manage daily life with a mental illness; engage in social activities; and engage in meaningful activities. Environment-focused supports included access to financial security; accommodation security; and community of choice. In addition to types of support, participants highlighted the importance of quality of support including the need for flexible; timely; and non-judgemental support. CONCLUSION: These results emphasise the multifaceted nature of support required by people living with schizophrenia to stay out of the hospital. Both type and quality of support are important. People in this study were able to clearly articulate the types and qualities of support that were important to them. Occupational therapists may benefit from greater collaboration with consumers during assessments of support needs and the development of recommendations. Further exploration of how occupational therapists identify people's multifaceted support needs is required.

Functional Performance and the Allen Cognitive Level Screen for Adults With Mental Illness: A Scoping Review.

IMPORTANCE: Research involving the use of the Allen Cognitive Level Screen (ACLS) in mental health practice has been available for more than 40 yr, yet there has been no comprehensive synthesis and review of this body of literature. OBJECTIVE: To review, summarize, compare, and evaluate the existing literature regarding the relationship between the ACLS and the functional and adaptive functional performance of adults living with mental illness. DATA SOURCES: Searches with no date limits were conducted in the CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ProQuest, and OTseeker databases. Study Selection and Data Collection: A five-stage scoping review methodology was used to examine peer-reviewed English-language literature reporting on the relationship between ACLS scores and functional and adaptive functional performance of adults with mental illness. Information from 15 studies was charted, collated, and numerically and thematically summarized. FINDINGS: A positive relationship between ACLS scores and in-the-moment performance was consistently reported. The relationship of ACLS scores to community living performance was less consistent. Methods of assessing performance, complexity of tasks assessed, and timing of assessments affected relationships with cognition as measured by ACLS. Gaps in the literature were identified. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Findings raise questions about how, why, and when occupational therapists use the ACLS. Increased examination is needed of what aspects of performance and functional cognition reliably determine people's ability to live successfully in the community. What This Article Adds: This article provides the first synthesis of the existing literature on the relationship between ACLS scores and functional and adaptive functional performance of people living with mental illness.

Factors related to hospital utilisation for people living with schizophrenia: Examining Allen's Cognitive Level Scores, recommended supports and routinely collected variables.

INTRODUCTION: Australian occupational therapists working on mental health inpatient wards are often requested to assess a person's function and, based on that assessment, recommend the best support environments for that person post-discharge. The Allen Cognitive Level Screen (ACLS) is a tool used by some therapists to screen cognitive functioning as a basis with which to make support recommendations. There is limited examination of the outcomes for people post-discharge if the ACLS score-based support recommendations are followed. METHOD: A retrospective cohort design involved quantitative analysis of archival data for 150 adult (18-65 years old) consumers with a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia and an ACLS completed pre-discharge. Data up to 12 months post-discharge from hospital were studied. Outcomes examined included re-presentations or readmission to hospital, length of time in community prior to re-presentation and length of stay in hospital if readmitted. RESULTS: Being younger, male, receiving formal supports, having a drug and alcohol disorder comorbidity, living in public housing and having a lower cognitive level as measured by the ACLS were significant univariate factors associated with higher hospital utilisation for one or more of the outcome variables. Multivariate analyses revealed fewer significant relationships, with being younger and receiving formal supports significantly associated with greater likelihood of return to hospital. CONCLUSION: This research contributes to evidence of the complexity of living with schizophrenia in the community and supporting people to stay out of hospital. More research regarding how the ACLS score-aligned support recommendations are carried out and the impact on hospital utilisation is needed in order to enhance occupational therapists confidence in their use and prescription.

Recruitment and retention issues for occupational therapists in mental health: balancing the pull and the push.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Recruitment and retention issues for mental health occupational therapists have been the subject of significant concern for many years. This paper describes recruitment and retention issues as reported by mental health occupational therapists employed by a large Area Health Service in metropolitan Sydney. METHOD: Thirty-eight mental health occupational therapists (response rate 84%) completed a survey in the first half of 2008. Key themes investigated were: overall satisfaction; attractive elements of positions; positive aspects of positions; constraints of positions; factors associated with leaving positions; supervision; professional development; career pathways; and interest in and access to management positions. RESULTS: Key elements that kept respondents in positions included the nature of the work, being in a supportive team and the opportunity to use occupational therapy skills. Elements that prompted people to consider leaving positions were the desire for new and different types of work, a desire to work closer to home, insufficient time or high workloads, feeling 'bored' or 'stale', organisational change or juggling multiple demands, working in unsupportive or dysfunctional teams and family or other personal factors. CONCLUSIONS: The results supported the development of a 'push and pull' conceptualization of recruitment and retention issues, including job-related (intrinsic) and non-job-related (extrinsic) issues. This conceptualization allows organisations to closely examine factors that attract practitioners to positions and those that support or damage staff tenure.